by Robert John Stevens, January 2, 2018
Suppose Utah County requires every vehicle buyer to purchase so many gallons of fuel a year.
During inversions when our air is dirty and unhealthy, some want the government to force people to drive less but what do we do about vehicles that consume less fuel?
Some citizens rarely drive and some have shorter commutes to work.
Some may want regulations for vehicles to be clean so they are pleasant to look at. If owners of dirty vehicles won’t comply then does that sound reasonable to pass regulations forcing them to wash their vehicles? Should we bless the owners of car washes?
Do any of these ideas justify a government one-size-solution?
Probably not–reason suggests there are too many variables to adopt such regulations.
Likewise, we like to see green farms; therefore, should we pass regulations requiring any new subdivisions in Utah County to have so many water rights?
But what months must their farms be green? Even irrigated alfalfa fields turn brown in the fall.
Some vegetables and plants can be planted in the late fall or winter months. For those willing to grow peas and flowers with natural rainwater and harvest them before spring, should they be required to have a minimum number of water rights that they won’t need?
What about the want-to-be farmer who wants to build vertical gardens or use hydroponics?
What do we do about innovators who study water recycling and water reuse and claim better agricultural productivity?
I’d like for the government to get out of the business of water rights for new subdivisions. It is hostile to want-to-be farmers and innovators. It keeps families from settling on farmland and children from growing up on farms.
Do we want more farms and more farmers? Do we want more or fewer food imports?
Just as it makes no sense for Utah County to regulate how many gallons of fuel a buyer must purchase, it makes no sense to require more than culinary water for a household.
See water Use in Utah (149 pages)