To Obey or Refuse? When the President Becomes the Enemy Within

Early Saturday Morning, August 31, 2013

Dear Senator Lee,

Our military oath requires Americans to obey the President and to defend the Constitution against enemies within, so if Obama breaks his constitutional oath and bombs Syria without Congressional approval should our soldiers obey or refuse?

If Obama bombs Syria, WW III may begin, go nuclear and be over in a very short time so prevention is critical. Please hold a press release. Get on the news. Play big. Take a hardline stance. Obama is a war criminal and delights in murder. He should be tried as the Nazis were in the Nuremberg Trials.

You know well the Book of Mormon teaches the only righteous side of war is to defend our families, religion and country.

We’ve never been closer to WW III since the early 1960s. Please do not delay and speak out.


Robert Stevens
Provo, Utah

U.S. leaks tell Assad he can relax. The bombing will be brief and limited.

Somebody, please try and prevent the U.S from starting WW III by bombing Syria.

Look, this is ridiculous. The White House is telling the world that bombing may start Thursday and may last three days. Isn’t that in itself a breach of national security? Are we supposed to be that stupid and that far past feeling to say, “Oh, then please ignore the will of the American people, please ignore Congress and International Law, and please do bomb Syria, Mr. President.”

War With Syria? Please Arrest President Obama for War Crimes

Letter sent to Senators Hatch, Lee, Cruz and Paul, and Congressman Chaffetz,

Please create an event to alert the American people how many wars Mr. Obama has started and keeps going, that he does not have authorization to start wars and if he does the Congress has the power to arrest him as a war criminal. Get the American people to think about this. We’re sick of war. We’re sick of a runaway tyrannical executive branch that is law unto themselves.

According to General Wesley Clark, war with Syria was planned by the Pentagon as early as 2001. Why is it that we destroy countries surrounding Israel? Does anyone see a pattern?

It is highly likely that the chemical attack was done by our own CIA to justify another war.

We were not attacked. No war has been declared against the United States. We’re bankrupt. We don’t need another war. We cannot guarantee there will not be American causalities.

Another war will certainly accelerate our financial collapse. Have you noticed how the Russians and Chinese haven’t intervened in any of our wars? It is because they laugh as we financially destroy ourselves. They could have done nothing better to ensure our collapse.

If Congress does not intercede or is past feeling, and God truly holds men responsible, then the number of dead may be divided by the number of elected officials who either promote this or did nothing and allowed it to happen.

Please intercede for moral reasons. Intercede for religious reasons. Intercede to demonize the democratic party or to promote your own republican party. Do it because you know Obama is guilty of many scandals and when things get this bad, starting another war is right out of the executive branch playbook. Do it because you are a man of principle and Americans will agree with you.


Robert Stevens
Provo, Utah


“The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America,” produced by the “right-leaning” New Century Foundation in 2005, using the same FBI and Justice surveys, startling facts emerge:

“Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks.” Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic.
Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.
“Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.” (If decent black folks have trouble hailing a cab, and they do, these numbers may help explain it.)
Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse.

Is the Federal Government Planning for Civil War?

by Robert John Stevens, Provo, Utah, August 22, 2013

When the facts do not fit the politically correct model, new models must be contemplated.

Napolitano: DHS Has ‘Deferred’ Deportation of 430,000 Illegals; Approved 98.3% of Applications Reviewed

It is well known that the Federal Government is stockpiling millions of rounds of hollow-point ammunition.

President Obama has started several wars. He approves of drone strikes and assassinations weekly. His abuse of power has led to the death and suffering of countless humans. Without a doubt future historians will portray him as having a public face but also as a serial killer who needed to frequently vent his rage. Rather than bring the country together, he sparks and supports dissension.

His known hero is Abraham Lincoln who usurped power and led a civil war that killed 750,000 soldiers who were mostly caucasian.

So as crazy as this may sound, are they preparing for civil war? Is their goal to use race to start a civil war? Will they arm people of color against white citizens?

Ezra Taft Benson told us many times that the U.S. could never be destroyed from outside–just from within. The wars in the Book of Mormon were fought by opposing armies of different color. Ether 8 tells us a secret combination will try and overthrow the freedom of all nations and seek the destruction of all people.

I awoke this morning with a big jolt and a lodged thought that the Federal Government is preparing for civil war. How does any civil war begin? How would you start one?

I think all it would take is a financial collapse preceded or followed by one or more EMPs, a few more false-flag operations to demonize white Americans, the federal government to arm people of color, the media to promote civil war and for Mr. Obama to order the arrest of controversial whites and to begin using force to disarm those whom he selectively chooses.

Is their plan to use civil war as their excuse to disarm the public?

Whatever events they use is not as important as whether or not they are planning to start a civil war.

Again, this may sound nuts, especially to a reader who has been brainwashed by the mainstream propaganda media. However, it is certainly a viable possibility and it seems to best fit the facts as we know them.

My next best hypothesis sides with the goodness of mankind, that the Federal Government expects a collapse and is simply arming to defend themselves and stay in power. That though would require far less ammunition and there would be no need to allow hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants to remain in the United States illegally.

Bradley Manning’s Letter to President Obama


The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.

I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing. It was at this time I realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability.

In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.

Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission.

Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy — the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps — to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.

As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”

I understand that my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.

If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society. I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.

Play the New Federal Government Game—What Will You Pay For?

Dear Senators Lee, Cruz and Paul,

Besides for defense and protecting liberty and what is defined specifically in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, what is the proper role of the federal government and what do we really want to pay for?

Many Utah citizens and Americans are asking this same question.

Try this exercise with your colleagues and staff. Considering the Golden Rule and that government shouldn’t steal or exist to redistribute wealth, pretend you’re beginning from scratch and your group wants to form a federal government and that every expenditure diminishes from your earnings, what list would you in good conscience create?

Can you ask every American to make their own list? Get the media to discuss it. I guarantee this will soon become one of the most important questions in America so why don’t you be the one to role it out on a grand scale?

Now historically, I can testify from my 28 years as a professional programmer that software becomes bloated with features. Often teams think that just because they are employeed they must add features. They listen to the “power users” (aka special interest groups) and then compromise the features the majority need to satisfy the few. Eventually startups come along and provide just the essentials that everyone really needed in the first place and then perhaps something new and innovative, usually for a much better price and eventually eat into the market share or take it over entirely.

I think if you perform this exercise and compare it to what your group is willing to give up from their own wages, and then compare that to what we have today, you will see just how misaligned and out of control things have become.

We call these entrepreneurial marketing events or low-cost things we can do to get massive publicity. You’re already doing one with the “don’t fund Obamacare” gig. I commend you. Keep rolling them out. Lead the charge. Keep the people thinking and the media spotlight will be yours. It may be our only hope to avoid as Dr. Ron Paul said on several occasions, that things will get much worse and will not end well for us.

Best Regards,

Robert John Stevens
Provo, Utah